Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Brumadinho MUD area #24

Open
PedroFZ opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 14 comments
Open

Brumadinho MUD area #24

PedroFZ opened this issue Jan 28, 2019 · 14 comments
Labels
external tool geo Info Info about Brumadinho dam ruptured

Comments

@PedroFZ
Copy link

PedroFZ commented Jan 28, 2019

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/FBC

Click the link to access the geoJSON or CSV to the polygon of MUD in BRUMADINHO.

@brunocroh brunocroh added the Info Info about Brumadinho dam ruptured label Jan 28, 2019
@endersonmaia
Copy link
Contributor

@brunocroh cria uma tag geo

@endersonmaia
Copy link
Contributor

@PedroFZ could you help in creating a query to list all the buildings inside the MUD area polygon ?

#26

@giselleCouto
Copy link

Ola para calculo da velocidade do rejeito, não vejo aqui no código algo parecido. talvez o movimento brawniano seja eficiente.

@PedroFZ
Copy link
Author

PedroFZ commented Jan 28, 2019

@PedroFZ could you help in creating a query to list all the buildings inside the MUD area polygon ?

#26

I can send the buildings in geoJSON OR CSV OR shapefile. which one?

@PedroFZ
Copy link
Author

PedroFZ commented Jan 28, 2019 via email

@joaosteinstraesser
Copy link

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/FBC

Click the link to access the geoJSON or CSV to the polygon of MUD in BRUMADINHO.

Would you also have the coordinates of the dam (the ''Barragem1" area in the map).? It may be necessary for simulating the dambreak problem

@endersonmaia
Copy link
Contributor

These are the building in MUD area. They was destroyed. Em seg, 28 de jan de 2019 às 17:29, Enderson Tadeu S. Maia < [email protected]> escreveu:

GitHub won't accept attachments, if that's what you've tried to do.

@endersonmaia
Copy link
Contributor

@PedroFZ could you help in creating a query to list all the buildings inside the MUD area polygon ?
#26

I can send the buildings in geoJSON OR CSV OR shapefile. which one?

I think GeoJSON would be easier to use with python.

@PedroFZ
Copy link
Author

PedroFZ commented Jan 28, 2019

These are the building in MUD area. They was destroyed. Em seg, 28 de jan de 2019 às 17:29, Enderson Tadeu S. Maia < [email protected]> escreveu:

GitHub won't accept attachments, if that's what you've tried to do.

I'm sorry, i'newbie in GitHyb.
I did the query in https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/FBC (MUD area).
But the building query I did it in QGIS, intersecting whit MUD area.
The OpenStreetMap community mapped the entire area in the last 24 hours.
Anyone can extract any data in geoJSON in overpass-turbo.eu
Result = 183 buildings was destroyed or damaged.

How can I send the building here?

@endersonmaia
Copy link
Contributor

@PedroFZ you can create a GIST with the .json and share the link here.

@roquef did this one : https://gist.github.com/roquef/bd1dd9d5ecf61efa5e61d8b422ab0096

@brunocroh brunocroh added the geo label Jan 28, 2019
@narceliodesa
Copy link

narceliodesa commented Jan 28, 2019

@endersonmaia @PedroFZ here is the area affected by mud flooding:
https://gist.github.com/narceliodesa/a43a90fa9ec1e8d5e4bdc7d7e32011fd

@andrepraeiro
Copy link

I have found a GitHub repository that has a view of the affect area. There are many details. I suggest you to take a look.
https://github.com/smaprs/BrumadinhoDam

@PedroFZ
Copy link
Author

PedroFZ commented Jan 11, 2021

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12fj

new link to MUD poligon

@PedroFZ
Copy link
Author

PedroFZ commented Jan 11, 2021

@brunocroh cria uma tag geo

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12fj novo link de consulta para o polígono da área atingida pela lama.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
external tool geo Info Info about Brumadinho dam ruptured
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants