-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define a probability matrix by columns does not work well #148
Comments
Hi, could you please provide a reproducible example? |
Hi, let the example of Gambler Ruin provided in the vignette. I modified the function you provided for generate this problem in such a way you can define how you want the vector probabilities (by row or by column):
I hope my answer be enough. Best ! Sergio |
I will have a look by the end of the month. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When the transition probability matrix is defined by columns (each column sums one) aparently works well, but it does not interpret correctly the "recurrent class", "transient class". In fact , it interprets the "recurrent classes" as "transient classes" and vice versa.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: