Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

URL X Hook #203

Open
logankaser opened this issue Aug 19, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

URL X Hook #203

logankaser opened this issue Aug 19, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@logankaser
Copy link

An X hook like Firefox's firefox -url "www.website.com" does not exist in breach nor is there a easy alternative.

@miketheprogrammer
Copy link

I will talk to @spolu about allowing for commandline params to be passed to modules on instantiation.

There are major updates and changes coming to breach. There will probably be some revision to the current module architecture and how modules register and interact with each other in the ecosystem.

Once the above and more is done, then you can definitely write a module to accomplish this.
For now, feel free to fork and hack on breach core and write something that does this.
I would look at breach_cores module registration system, and mod_strip.

@logankaser
Copy link
Author

Just thought you might like the whole story.

"Hi,

Not at the moment but it's fairly easy to add to the current version. If
you file an issue I'll add it as soon as I get back from holidays end of
August.

We're also working on a new version that should be even more awesome.

What are your timelines for integration / release?

Best

-stan"

--Logan Kaser

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Michael Hernandez <[email protected]

wrote:

I will talk to @spolu https://github.com/spolu about allowing for
commandline params to be passed to modules on instantiation.

There are major updates and changes coming to breach. There will probably
be some revision to the current module architecture and how modules
register and interact with each other in the ecosystem.

Once the above and more is done, then you can definitely write a module to
accomplish this.
For now, feel free to fork and hack on breach core and write something
that does this.
I would look at breach_cores module registration system, and mod_strip.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#203 (comment).

@miketheprogrammer
Copy link

Sounds good lets wait for spolu to get back. I would love this as well. I
don't get to actually hack on breach that much since I'm working on exo.
Can't wait for this to actually be available though.
On Aug 22, 2014 3:25 PM, "Logan Kaser" [email protected] wrote:

Just thought you might like the whole story.

"Hi,

Not at the moment but it's fairly easy to add to the current version. If
you file an issue I'll add it as soon as I get back from holidays end of
August.

We're also working on a new version that should be even more awesome.

What are your timelines for integration / release?

Best

-stan"

--Logan Kaser

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Michael Hernandez <
[email protected]

wrote:

I will talk to @spolu https://github.com/spolu about allowing for
commandline params to be passed to modules on instantiation.

There are major updates and changes coming to breach. There will
probably
be some revision to the current module architecture and how modules
register and interact with each other in the ecosystem.

Once the above and more is done, then you can definitely write a module
to
accomplish this.
For now, feel free to fork and hack on breach core and write something
that does this.
I would look at breach_cores module registration system, and mod_strip.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#203 (comment).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#203 (comment).

@spolu
Copy link
Owner

spolu commented Aug 27, 2014

Tagging as enhancement. We'll make sure to include it in the next version of Breach!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants