Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider changing check-sat-assuming interface #153

Open
makaimann opened this issue Jan 5, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Consider changing check-sat-assuming interface #153

makaimann opened this issue Jan 5, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@makaimann
Copy link
Collaborator

Some solvers require that assumptions to check-sat-assuming be propositional literals. This is based on the SMT-LIB documentation. However, in smt-lib you can use a define-fun rather than introducing a new constant. Thus it seems overly restrictive to require boolean literals in the API, rather than any boolean formula. Some solvers require boolean literals in the API, but we could consider hiding that from the user.
@makaimann makaimann added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@makaimann