-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluate and adopt wasmi v0.32+ (register machine) #1313
Comments
I've pushed a new branch https://github.com/jayz22/wasmi/tree/parity-v32-beta containing necessary change to adapt stellar/wasmi into it. Here is the experimental soroban-env branch https://github.com/jayz22/rs-soroban-env/tree/explore-wasmi using it. |
7 tasks
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2024
This is a sketch of the first step in the plan for addressing #1292 and eventually #827 and #1313, namely: - add a bunch of cost types that decompose the current "worst case" VM instantiation cost type - continue to charge the worst case on initial contract upload - _store_ the decomposed cost-type inputs in the ledger, since we can observe them after the initial upload parse - _use_ those decomposed cost-type inputs when doing runtime instantiation - add a module cache - populate the module cache with all modules on host startup - use cached modules during instantiation This PR has accompanying changes in XDR and wasmi: - stellar/stellar-xdr#177 - stellar/rs-stellar-xdr#346 Remaining to do: - [x] determine what the correct set of decomposed cost types even is - [ ] ~add more code to wasmi to enable observing more inputs~ - [x] add cost-type runners / calibrations for all the decomposed cost-types - [x] protocol-gate this new behaviour - [x] make the linker-loop do less work to match the tighter cost model (i.e. complete #1292) - [x] possibly _duplicate_ the set of cost types added here, so we have a cached and uncached version of each, and implement a solution to #827 - [ ] possibly decompose the set sufficiently to model what will happen when we take wasmi 0.32 and enable lazy translation (i.e. complete #1313)
graydon
changed the title
Evaluate wasmi v0.32
Evaluate and adopt wasmi v0.32+ (register machine)
Oct 8, 2024
This was backed out before protocol 22. Will try again in subsequent protocols. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Wasmi recently released v0.32.0-beta.0 which contains new major features:
This issue tracks the experimentation to use the new version in soroban-env, and accessing the performance impacts of various compilation/validation modes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: