Allow creating a rule that combines other rules using OR

[altmank]

User story.
As a spectral user, I can create rules that combine other rules and evaluate them using OR, so that I can define rules where one of multiple possible approaches is valid but only 1 is required.

Is your feature request related to a problem?
I cannot create a rule currently that forces a parameter to have an example but allow the example to be in the schema or in the top level parameter object.

Example:

Describe the solution you'd like
I can define each of these rules individually, to look for example in the schema object, or in the parameter object, and then add a truthy function on them, but I cannot check both of these together using OR logic.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

[P0lip]

Hey!
Thanks for submitting the feature request.
We already have a similar proposal over here #1276, so I'm going to close this one out.
Feel free to upvote and follow the one above

[altmank]

@P0lip #1276 appears to be specific to combining functions, whereas I want to combine rules. I do not believe combining functions would solve for the example I raised here.

[altmank]

@P0lip Is there some other approach you can think of that would solve this example? It isn't encouraging that the other item you referenced is 3 years old. I tried something like this but it did not work:

"given": [ "$.paths.*.*.parameters[?(@.example || @.schema.example)]" ], "severity": "error", "then": { "function": "defined" },