Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SwaggerEditor@next: Integrate [email protected] & release #4828

Closed
char0n opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

SwaggerEditor@next: Integrate [email protected] & release #4828

char0n opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@char0n
Copy link
Member

char0n commented Mar 22, 2024

[email protected] comes with Dereferencing Architecture 2.0.

The integration will fix many dereference related issues, like one described in swagger-api/apidom#3735.

@char0n
Copy link
Member Author

char0n commented Mar 22, 2024

Addressed in #4829

@char0n
Copy link
Member Author

char0n commented Mar 22, 2024

There was a regression in e2e cypress tests that was fixed in #4844

@char0n
Copy link
Member Author

char0n commented Mar 25, 2024

Performance optimization for reference validation addressed in #4849

@char0n char0n changed the title SwaggerEditor@next: Integrate [email protected] SwaggerEditor@next: Integrate [email protected] & release Mar 25, 2024
swagger-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 25, 2024
# [5.0.0-alpha.89](v5.0.0-alpha.88...v5.0.0-alpha.89) (2024-03-25)

### Bug Fixes

* **monaco-language-apidom:** fix validation issues related to dereferencing ([#4847](#4847)) ([b246122](b246122)), closes [#4828](#4828)
* use @asyncapi/[email protected] ([#4846](#4846)) ([bf95220](bf95220)), closes [#4845](#4845)

### Performance Improvements

* **language-apidom:** improve performance of reference validation ([#4849](#4849)) ([1ef9b96](1ef9b96)), closes [#4828](#4828)
@char0n
Copy link
Member Author

char0n commented Mar 25, 2024

@char0n char0n closed this as completed Mar 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant