Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Installation - exa package not available on Alma 9.5 #1752

Open
mkrsfcmp opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Installation - exa package not available on Alma 9.5 #1752

mkrsfcmp opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
no basic support info Please follow the guidelines so we can help upstream-bug

Comments

@mkrsfcmp
Copy link

Trying to install on a freshly installed Alma 9.5 server (actually the server was installed using 9.4 image and then immediately dnf-ugpraded but it shouldn't matter.

When I run the installer it runs OK up until the "Install recommended packages (AlmaLinux,Rocky)" step when it fails.

TASK [Install recommended packages (AlmaLinux, Rocky)] ***************************************************************************************************************************************
fatal: [127.0.0.1]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "failures": ["No package exa available."], "msg": "Failed to install some of the specified packages", "rc": 1, "results": []}

PLAY RECAP ***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
127.0.0.1                  : ok=9    changed=3    unreachable=0    failed=1    skipped=1    rescued=0    ignored=0   

### Something went wrong with the Playbook, please review the output and / or install_tpot.log for clues.
### Aborting.

There seem to be no available exa package for Alma (no eza neither).

$ sudo dnf info exa
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:48 ago on Thu Jan 30 15:13:27 2025.
Error: No matching Packages to list
$ sudo dnf info eza
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:52 ago on Thu Jan 30 15:13:27 2025.
Error: No matching Packages to list
$ cat /etc/os-release 
NAME="AlmaLinux"
VERSION="9.5 (Teal Serval)"
ID="almalinux"
ID_LIKE="rhel centos fedora"
VERSION_ID="9.5"
PLATFORM_ID="platform:el9"
PRETTY_NAME="AlmaLinux 9.5 (Teal Serval)"
ANSI_COLOR="0;34"
LOGO="fedora-logo-icon"
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:almalinux:almalinux:9::baseos"
HOME_URL="https://almalinux.org/"
DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://wiki.almalinux.org/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.almalinux.org/"
ALMALINUX_MANTISBT_PROJECT="AlmaLinux-9"
ALMALINUX_MANTISBT_PROJECT_VERSION="9.5"
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="AlmaLinux"
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="9.5"
SUPPORT_END=2032-06-01
$ sudo dnf info epel-release
Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:02 ago on Thu Jan 30 15:13:27 2025.
Installed Packages
Name         : epel-release
Version      : 9
Release      : 9.el9
Architecture : noarch
Size         : 26 k
Source       : epel-release-9-9.el9.src.rpm
Repository   : @System
From repo    : extras
Summary      : Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux repository configuration
URL          : http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel
License      : GPLv2
Description  : This package contains the Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) repository
             : GPG key as well as configuration for yum.
$ cat version
24.04.1
@github-actions github-actions bot added the no basic support info Please follow the guidelines so we can help label Jan 30, 2025
@t3chn0m4g3 t3chn0m4g3 self-assigned this Jan 30, 2025
@t3chn0m4g3
Copy link
Member

It seems Alma and Rocky have removed eza from its repositories. If not reinstated by the end of the weekend we will be adjusting the installer by removing exa / eza support for all supported distributions.

@t3chn0m4g3
Copy link
Member

@mkrsfcmp Thanks for reporting!

@dio-gif
Copy link

dio-gif commented Feb 2, 2025

commenting out the lines related to exa / eza in the. yml located at /home/user/tpotce/installer/install/tpot.yml worked for me. It installed fully and ran fine. Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no basic support info Please follow the guidelines so we can help upstream-bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants