Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

review sites #9

Open
Jakob-Unfried opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

review sites #9

Jakob-Unfried opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Jakob-Unfried
Copy link
Member

  • Move from cyten.networks.site to some appropriate place. we probably dont want a cyten.networks submodule
  • The current implementation, in particular the charged tensor part is probably not what we want.
  • Should establish some framework for few-body operators, that knows how to compose them.

Random related ideas:

  • MPS should know more about operators. either access to lattice / model or to a special class that is essentially a list of sites but has operators and N_sites_per_ring?
  • Devise classes for on-site operators and for few-body-operators.
    There is a class of "elementary" operators (classification depends on what is conserved!) that have virtual legs with only a single sector and are thus the natural building blocks for MPOs. but we could also support linear combinations thereof.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant