Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Native support for Application Load Balancer #91

Open
shmish111 opened this issue Sep 21, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Native support for Application Load Balancer #91

shmish111 opened this issue Sep 21, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@shmish111
Copy link

AWS ALB has Lambda integration now however the events it sends are slightly different to the APIGW Lambda Proxy events and UseWithAPIGateway can't cope with these differences it seems. It would be great to have either UseWithALB or even better something that allowed use with both. I couldn't find any official documentation with explicit differences however this blog post outlines them https://serverless-training.com/articles/api-gateway-vs-application-load-balancer-technical-details/#feature-differences-between-application-load-balancer-and-api-gateway

@NickSeagull NickSeagull added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 21, 2020
@NickSeagull
Copy link
Member

Thanks for reporting! It would be sure awesome to keep up with the new features, PR's are very welcome!

@shmish111
Copy link
Author

Lol, I appreciate your sentiment. I may get the chance to work on it, it depends on how desperate I get for working with ALB.

BTW, awesome job on this library, when used together with https://hackage.haskell.org/package/aws-lambda-haskell-runtime-wai it makes a really awesome setup where you can have a local dev server running warp and lambdas in production. If only lambdas had much bigger limits I could do so much more with this!

@dnikolovv
Copy link
Contributor

dnikolovv commented Dec 24, 2020

Just notifying you guys that I'm working on that. Should be shipped with v4.0.0 that has no TH.

Update: This is done in #97

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants