You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should investigate using the cubic generator James created last year as opposed to the trapezoidal one we are currently using. I think we are likely to find we can crank the speed higher because it is better at smoothly decelerating from high speeds. It also gives us control over the time that we get to specific points - useful when trying to get more than one cube in auto.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should investigate using the cubic generator James created last year as opposed to the trapezoidal one we are currently using. I think we are likely to find we can crank the speed higher because it is better at smoothly decelerating from high speeds. It also gives us control over the time that we get to specific points - useful when trying to get more than one cube in auto.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: