-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
QSFS: Performance numbers are not matching the requirements #24
Comments
Can you first check how fast is
Can you show how About the 10 millions crash, I'll open an issue on For the slowdown, this can happen because adding 1 million file in a single directory is a really bad thing to do, even on real filesystem. But I could notice already a huge drop down after reaching some point, but could not reproduce yet, I'll open an issue for that as well and will keep here notified. |
After investigating and some debugging, I think the I have a I'm looking to improve that memory usage. |
So for the performance numbers
The |
You misunderstood the test regarding For the memory usage, I guess |
Yep my bad :D i got confused there for a second.
Indeed and the result from executing
and by increasing the memory to |
According to TC343 & REQ177 the min performance for big files (1GB) should be 100 MB/S but the actual figure is much lower
TC344 & REQ178 the min performance for mid files (1M) should be 100 MB/S but the actual figure is lower
TC345 & REQ179 the min performance for small files (1K) should be 1 MB/S but the actual figure is lower
TC346 & REQ180 states that it should be possible to create 10 million small files on a single qsfs. but when i tried to do that with the following script i lost connection to the vm
however when the number was changed to 1 million instead of 10 million i was able to create the files as it can be seen in the metrics
and i tried to create another 1 million files after the first 1 mil were done, it didn't crash or lose connection but the process is much slower than the first 1 mil
The same issues are also available in these test cases and requirements TC347, TC348, TC349 & REQ181, REQ182, REQ183 these are the same the same scenarios as mentioned above but with S3 Minio and the results are also very similar to the previous scenarios.
Config
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: