Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

should addf raise when varargs len is 0 (to avoid a pitpfall)? #780

Open
timotheecour opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

should addf raise when varargs len is 0 (to avoid a pitpfall)? #780

timotheecour opened this issue Jul 8, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@timotheecour
Copy link
Owner

timotheecour commented Jul 8, 2021 •
edited
Loading

placeholder to discuss a (minor) point raised in nim-lang#18418 (comment)

It's also unclear whether addf should be a proc or a template/macro because in practice we don't need a RT varargs[string]; hopefully this can be addressed with upcomping addConcat / concat discussed elsewhere.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@timotheecour