You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm sorry for a vague bug report, but I can't share the data files we're dealing with here since they're confidential.
But on both the sas7bdat files I've tried SASLib.jl with, the output is either obviously wrong or diverges from what readstat (with CSV export + CSV.jl) and ReadStat.jl (which uses the C API of readstat directly). By "obviously wrong" I mean that SASLib produces a table of the correct schema (types and column names) but with all 0.0/"" values. For the other one, the structure again appears to be correct, but some values are incorrect (e.g., a bunch of numeric values are different; the strings appear to be okay).
Again, sorry I can't share any more details about this but I'd be willing to do some debugging if you have suggestions about where to start!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On another note, I had also seen issue when the SAS file is compressed. If you also control the upstream data pipeline then you can play around different compression options.
It would be helpful if you can take a dataset, mask away data with random values, and share that file for testing. Also, smaller file is easier to work with as long as you can replicate the same problem with a smaller file.
I'm sorry for a vague bug report, but I can't share the data files we're dealing with here since they're confidential.
But on both the sas7bdat files I've tried SASLib.jl with, the output is either obviously wrong or diverges from what readstat (with CSV export + CSV.jl) and ReadStat.jl (which uses the C API of readstat directly). By "obviously wrong" I mean that SASLib produces a table of the correct schema (types and column names) but with all
0.0
/""
values. For the other one, the structure again appears to be correct, but some values are incorrect (e.g., a bunch of numeric values are different; the strings appear to be okay).Again, sorry I can't share any more details about this but I'd be willing to do some debugging if you have suggestions about where to start!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: