Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scientific (real-world) validity of UXsim simulations #95

Open
EwoutH opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Scientific (real-world) validity of UXsim simulations #95

EwoutH opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@EwoutH
Copy link
Contributor

EwoutH commented Jul 30, 2024

While UXsim is pretty wel rooted in theory in its paper, I think the next step is to show it simulations are valid and consistent with the real-world. There are multiple approaches to this, but I think one of the ways to go is to compare UXsim with other traffic simulation models, and show that results are consistent and roughly similar.

It would also be interesting to show at which spatial and temporal resolutions UXsim starts to break down (how rough is too rough) and at what hyperparameters UXsim starts to be inaccurate (like platooning group size).

This could be shown in a notebook or two, and tested with each release. The results could be included in the docs and the scientific paper.

@toruseo
Copy link
Owner

toruseo commented Jul 30, 2024

Good point, but this will be very tough job. I have some plans, but I cannot address them right now.

Since the underlying traffic flow and route choice models are standard in the literature, I think we can say that it is acceptable for academic research in many situations. But as you pointed out, "how much value is acceptable for the platooning size deltan" is an important open question.

In fact, I have partially validated in the Chicago data uploaded today:
https://toruseo.jp/UXsim/docs/notebooks/demo_notebook_08en_chicago.html#Validation
I have compared UXsim's result and a reference solution of static user equilibrium assignment. Because the assignment principles are different we cannot say for sure, but I think we can say the results are a kind of plausible.

@EwoutH
Copy link
Contributor Author

EwoutH commented Jul 30, 2024

Thanks! If you have any more ideas, just post them here, and we will see who will get to them first! :)

On thing I'm specifically curious about is how well OSMnx generated networks translate to the real world.

@toruseo
Copy link
Owner

toruseo commented Aug 2, 2024

@EwoutH
BTW, is it possible to share your model by adding it to demos_and_examples in this repo?

The current examples are all written by me and reflect my coding style. It would be very informative for me and other users if there were examples written by other people (especially those who are familiar with modern sophisticated styles).

@EwoutH
Copy link
Contributor Author

EwoutH commented Aug 5, 2024

Certainly! I'm still developing and calibrating it and so, but when it's (close to) finished I will definitely share it.

It will be an agent-based model (likely using Mesa) using UXsim, so I expect it will offer a very nice example what's possible with such a hybrid model.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants