-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scientific (real-world) validity of UXsim simulations #95
Comments
Good point, but this will be very tough job. I have some plans, but I cannot address them right now. Since the underlying traffic flow and route choice models are standard in the literature, I think we can say that it is acceptable for academic research in many situations. But as you pointed out, "how much value is acceptable for the platooning size In fact, I have partially validated in the Chicago data uploaded today: |
Thanks! If you have any more ideas, just post them here, and we will see who will get to them first! :) On thing I'm specifically curious about is how well OSMnx generated networks translate to the real world. |
@EwoutH The current examples are all written by me and reflect my coding style. It would be very informative for me and other users if there were examples written by other people (especially those who are familiar with modern sophisticated styles). |
Certainly! I'm still developing and calibrating it and so, but when it's (close to) finished I will definitely share it. It will be an agent-based model (likely using Mesa) using UXsim, so I expect it will offer a very nice example what's possible with such a hybrid model. |
While UXsim is pretty wel rooted in theory in its paper, I think the next step is to show it simulations are valid and consistent with the real-world. There are multiple approaches to this, but I think one of the ways to go is to compare UXsim with other traffic simulation models, and show that results are consistent and roughly similar.
It would also be interesting to show at which spatial and temporal resolutions UXsim starts to break down (how rough is too rough) and at what hyperparameters UXsim starts to be inaccurate (like platooning group size).
This could be shown in a notebook or two, and tested with each release. The results could be included in the docs and the scientific paper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: