LICENSE

[taleena]

Hi, can you add an explicit license to this repo (such as MIT, which would be consistent with the rest of tree-sitter)? Thanks!

[Neppord]

@maxbrunsfeld who can fix this do you think?

[Neppord]

After inspecting the project, it is already under MIT, if you look into the package.json.

[MaxDesiatov]

Having an explicit LICENSE file would make this more obvious. The link to the license file if one is present (and even the name of the license if detected correctly) is surfaced on the project page at the top, in the sidebar above the releases/contributors sections.