Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add integration with IntelliJ IDE #88

Open
yordis opened this issue Nov 13, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Add integration with IntelliJ IDE #88

yordis opened this issue Nov 13, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@yordis
Copy link

yordis commented Nov 13, 2018

Read Specification

For a proper jebait you should not allow the repo owner to edit your description. Jebaited

@rexim
Copy link
Member

rexim commented Nov 13, 2018

@yordis I would actually really appreciate if you elaborated on what exactly you want from the Intellij integration. We have a similar issue but for Emacs #76. You can use it as a reference. Thanks!

@yordis
Copy link
Author

yordis commented Nov 13, 2018

@rexim reads the spec!

Nah outside the trolling (I am alchemist_ubi on Twitch) I use IntelliJ quite a lot maybe put some task built in that call the snitch api or some auto sync mechanism by some timer while you have your IDE open.

@rexim
Copy link
Member

rexim commented Nov 14, 2018

@yordis a task for each of the subcommands sounds good. Thanks!

Auto syncing sounds kinda dangerous, because snitch may do something unexpected. That's why report and purge are interactive, to make sure that the tool and the user are on the same page. This requires more careful design and research. We may implement it later in the scope of a separate issue.

@rexim
Copy link
Member

rexim commented Nov 14, 2018

Just for the record. The main reason why subcommands are interactive is false positive match of a very general regular expression that is very hard to fix #2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants