Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why you use pseudo_vocals to Calculate the loss of the validation set? #198

Open
Niuguangshuo opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@Niuguangshuo
Copy link

No description provided.

@tsurumeso
Copy link
Owner

Because I don't have vocals dataset.

@Niuguangshuo
Copy link
Author

因为我没有声音数据集。

I have a large amount of noise and speech data, so can I not use pseudo anymore? Is it better to calculate directly using real speech as the validation set?

@Niuguangshuo
Copy link
Author

You have two datasets, Mix and Inst. Isn't speech calculated as Mix minus Inst?

@tsurumeso
Copy link
Owner

tsurumeso commented Aug 2, 2024

The reason I use pseudo_vocal is that my own mix source and inst source have different volume, so if I simply calculate the difference, the inst source will remain in the vocal.

@Niuguangshuo
Copy link
Author

我使用 pseudo_vocal 的原因是我自己的混音源和 inst 源具有不同的音量,因此如果我简单地计算差异,inst 源将保留在人声中。

I know .Thank you very much,I obtained the mixture from the original noise and speech, so I can calculate the difference. I will modify the code to adapt to my data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants