You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In trainer.py, the training dataset seeems to be set as Dataset from dataset_lossy.py, and only use the first four sequences from sequence_list, i.e. soldier/longdress/redandblack/loot. And the testing dataset used in test_owlii.py is from dataset_owlii.
However, according to the paper, the training dataset is generated from owlii and the model is tested on 8ivfb. Do these two strategy give similar results?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The uploaded codes use 8iVFB for training and Owlii for testing because our proposals to MPEG AI-3DGC follow this experiment setting. To reproduce the results in the paper (Owlii for training and 8iVFB for testing), just change the parameters in trainer.py and test_owlii.py.
In trainer.py, the training dataset seeems to be set as Dataset from dataset_lossy.py, and only use the first four sequences from sequence_list, i.e. soldier/longdress/redandblack/loot. And the testing dataset used in test_owlii.py is from dataset_owlii.
However, according to the paper, the training dataset is generated from owlii and the model is tested on 8ivfb. Do these two strategy give similar results?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: