You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Excluding the issues I identified in #237 and that have been partially fixed in #239. I've found that the Sombrero ITT-sn benchmark is too small for the largest nodes (in terms of number of cores). In particular, on the CSD3 Sapphire Rapids, with 112 cores per node (although I am only using 108 tasks due to #237 (comment)), the results can fluctuate massively between repeated runs (even on the exact same node) - I have observed variations as much as ~80%.
Changing the arguments passed to the executable from -s small to -s medium resolve this problem for me but this is currently what is used for the 64 node benchmark. I don't have the resources to test this but I suspect this benchmark will also be too small for 64 nodes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Excluding the issues I identified in #237 and that have been partially fixed in #239. I've found that the Sombrero ITT-sn benchmark is too small for the largest nodes (in terms of number of cores). In particular, on the CSD3 Sapphire Rapids, with 112 cores per node (although I am only using 108 tasks due to #237 (comment)), the results can fluctuate massively between repeated runs (even on the exact same node) - I have observed variations as much as ~80%.
Changing the arguments passed to the executable from
-s small
to-s medium
resolve this problem for me but this is currently what is used for the 64 node benchmark. I don't have the resources to test this but I suspect this benchmark will also be too small for 64 nodes.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: