You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The GeoJSON format for all the latest GeoJSON files have a json schema of {"type": "Feature", "properties": {'Code': 'AK-AL', 'District': 'Alaska At-Large'}, "geometry": {"type": "MultiPolygon", "coordinates": [...]} }
However, for non-voting cds, their format is only the dictionary inside the "geometry", i.e. {"type": "MultiPolygon", "coordinates": [...]}. Now, the AK-0 2012 is the same format, but AK 2016 goes with the format above. I think we should update the non voting districts like AS-0. Please let me know if I should directly update the geojson files in 2012 or create a new directory called 2021 that goes with the new format.
The GeoJSON format for all the latest GeoJSON files have a json schema of
{"type": "Feature", "properties": {'Code': 'AK-AL', 'District': 'Alaska At-Large'}, "geometry": {"type": "MultiPolygon", "coordinates": [...]} }
However, for non-voting cds, their format is only the dictionary inside the "geometry", i.e.
{"type": "MultiPolygon", "coordinates": [...]}
. Now, the AK-0 2012 is the same format, but AK 2016 goes with the format above. I think we should update the non voting districts like AS-0. Please let me know if I should directly update the geojson files in 2012 or create a new directory called 2021 that goes with the new format.more debugging info: Hear-Ye/find-your-district-and-representatives#2 (comment)
Thanks for this awesome repo!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: