You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am evaluating bun for usage in one of my projects with an existing (MariaDB) database.
From the documentation I got this example:
It says it would use INNER JOIN instead of LEFT JOIN but It just uses LEFT JOIN with the IS NOT NULL clause. It will give the correct results but is it really expected to do it. If yes, I think the wording in the documentation needs to be "To simulate INNER JOIN instead of LEFT JOIN".
I also would like if I can force it to use INNER JOIN, especially if there is always a relation enforced in the database and everything else would be an error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. If there is no update within the next 7 days, this issue will be closed.
This is pretty sad. We needed to write a lot of code manually in the last two years. This is missing and IMHO huge performance killer. Time to move on.
I am evaluating bun for usage in one of my projects with an existing (MariaDB) database.
From the documentation I got this example:
It says it would use
INNER JOIN
instead ofLEFT JOIN
but It just usesLEFT JOIN
with theIS NOT NULL
clause. It will give the correct results but is it really expected to do it. If yes, I think the wording in the documentation needs to be "To simulate INNER JOIN instead of LEFT JOIN".I also would like if I can force it to use
INNER JOIN
, especially if there is always a relation enforced in the database and everything else would be an error.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: