Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REQUEST] Add value set to OBX-5 without co-constraint #1339

Open
carolinerosin opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[REQUEST] Add value set to OBX-5 without co-constraint #1339

carolinerosin opened this issue Sep 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@carolinerosin
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I think this is not possible to do in IGAMT, maybe not even in the validation, so we need to have a discussion.
I need to assign a value set binding to OBX-5, when the value of OBX-2 is CWE. I do not have a co-constraint (so no particular value for OBX-3), so I cannot use co-constraint to do that.

Describe the solution you'd like
We need to find a way/place in IGAMT to add a value set binding to OBX-5, under certain conditions (ex: OBX-2 value). Could be in dynamic mapping or in co-constraint, not sure what is best...
I'm open to other suggestions/ideas if anyone has a better idea.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I could implement it using the "value set" conformance statement, but I'd like to avoid that if possible. It is not intuitive for "regular" users. Also I'd like to use the value set validation module, not the conformance statements one (if possible).

Additional context
n/a

@carolinerosin carolinerosin added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 10, 2021
@carolinerosin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

carolinerosin commented Sep 15, 2021

So Rob suggested doing that
image

I'm not sure if that actually works. Even if it does, I'm not sure I like it...

Edit:
just found another way, but still not 100% convinced about having to go in the co-constraints
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants