You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want to perform RELAX and Contrast-FEL analyses on highly diverged dengue serotypes. The serotypes themselves cluster nicely, but there are long branches separating the clades that I don't want to include in my comparative analysis.
I used label-tree.bf to label each clade using regular expressions, but the long branches leading to the most recent common ancestor of each clade are also labeled. I would like an option to ignore the MRCA when labeling internal nodes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Try the --internal-nodes "All descendants, no MRCA" option in the just updated label-tree.bf. It may be too aggressive, so check. I should work well on the trees where you don't have a particular labeled clade spanning the root.
This works very well for three of my clades (DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4), but some of the internal branches in DENV1 should be tagged but are not tagged. I believe that one of the nodes in DENV1 was likely chosen (arbitrarily) as the root. I've attached one of the newick trees I labeled as an example.
I want to perform RELAX and Contrast-FEL analyses on highly diverged dengue serotypes. The serotypes themselves cluster nicely, but there are long branches separating the clades that I don't want to include in my comparative analysis.
I used
label-tree.bf
to label each clade using regular expressions, but the long branches leading to the most recent common ancestor of each clade are also labeled. I would like an option to ignore the MRCA when labeling internal nodes.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: