We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm wondering if there is any benefit to this sink (in its current form) being an PeriodicBatchingSink?
PeriodicBatchingSink
As it stands, EmitBatch is simple sendin each message in the batch one-by-one, such that every message is sent using a new TCP connection.
EmitBatch
I can see how this would make sense if #4 was implemented, as you would only flush at the end of every batch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it probably makes more sense to go ahead and implement #4, but will keep this open in case it's not implemented
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I'm wondering if there is any benefit to this sink (in its current form) being an
PeriodicBatchingSink
?As it stands,
EmitBatch
is simple sendin each message in the batch one-by-one, such that every message is sent using a new TCP connection.I can see how this would make sense if #4 was implemented, as you would only flush at the end of every batch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: