You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, DLW has a large number of donors and donees. The diversity is good, but it would be good to have an "of-EA-interest" view of DLW.
More generally, it would be good to have a "of-rationality-community-interest" view or a "of-AI-safety-interest" view.
While cause areas is one way to go about it, perhaps explicity tagging specific donors or donees based on the communities they are part of would map more closely with what we care about here.
A few other thoughts:
If we are doing an "of EA interest" view, would we filter out Open Phil's criminal justice reform grants? (These have generated very little EA interest)
Would we include grants from non-EA-interest donors to EA-interest donees? Or even non-EA-interest donors to non-EA-interest donees if there was some EA-interest idea mentioned in the notes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, DLW has a large number of donors and donees. The diversity is good, but it would be good to have an "of-EA-interest" view of DLW.
More generally, it would be good to have a "of-rationality-community-interest" view or a "of-AI-safety-interest" view.
While cause areas is one way to go about it, perhaps explicity tagging specific donors or donees based on the communities they are part of would map more closely with what we care about here.
A few other thoughts:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: