UML Model Naming

[jGleitz]

Our current transformations are inconsistent in how they name the UML model:

PCM→UML: Call the modcel "umlrootmodel"
Java→UML: Ask the user for the name

This is also inconsistent in so far as that a UML model roughly corresponds to a PCM Repository. For PCM repositories, we derive the name from the package name in the Java→PCM transformation. For a UML model, we don’t. On the other hand, giving the model the name of the first package does not make sense for the Java→UML transformation if it isn’t used together with the PCM transformation.

My proposal: Let’s not set any name on the UML model at all, since the name is unsettable. There are other possible solutions, of course, but I think we should settle for a consistent one.