Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Matter protocol similarities #308

Open
backkem opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Matter protocol similarities #308

backkem opened this issue Aug 28, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@backkem
Copy link
Contributor

backkem commented Aug 28, 2023

I was reading the Matter spec an it occurred to me how similar some of the protocol is to OSP. Matter also does mDNS discovery and secure channel using PAKE and even has a basic remote playback device type. I wonder if it makes sense to unify both efforts. Though Matter doest include a video streaming spec yet I believe.

@tidoust
Copy link
Member

tidoust commented Aug 29, 2023

Yes, the Second Screen Working Group is looking at interoperability and possible alignment with Matter:

What the group did not have was a tracking issue, thanks for creating one @backkem!

@backkem
Copy link
Contributor Author

backkem commented Aug 30, 2023

Great comparison @mfoltzgoogle! sorry I didn't catch that earlier.

I wanted to share a look at discovery/rendezvous from a functional standpoint. It seems each approach is born from a slightly different use-case:

  • Matter focuses on creating an established network or 'Fabric'. This makes sense in a home setting where you connect once and get access to multiple (IoT) devices for longer time period.
  • The OSP focuses more on point connections such as a meeting room with a TV you want to cast to.
  • Similarly the local-peer-to-peer proposal puts a specific focus on more ephemeral connections between devices that are physically in close proximity.

They all seem valid use-cases to me. I think the merit to building these on a unified stack is to foster (broader) adoption and avoid a fractured ecosystem (as embodied by this comment). Maybe there is room to contribute a lightweight connection establishment flow back to Matter based on the OSP work.

@anssiko
Copy link
Member

anssiko commented Aug 31, 2023

@backkem, I like how you bucketed discovery requirements into "established" and "ephemeral" connections.

I'd want to refer here to the Matter browser support issue project-chip/connectedhomeip#4270 you opened, also acknowledged in our Second Screen WG March 2023 discussions. I think it is worth revising this issue with new information to see if the "future" is now. @backkem you're welcome to give the WG a brief update on your latest thinking at our upcoming meeting. This issue is now on the agenda: w3c/secondscreen-wg#10

I'm expecting @mfoltzgoogle to give an update on a few specific technical areas of investigation for Matter and OSP interoperability. I'm also expecting Apple participants to attend which might help bridge the two efforts.

@markafoltz markafoltz added the F2F label Sep 11, 2023
@rektide
Copy link

rektide commented Jan 9, 2024

Amazon now has Matter casting in the Prime Video app and on their Echo Show 15 device. https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/9/24030324/amazon-matter-casting-echo-show-fire-tv-prime-video

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants