We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
require-sri-for
Related to #16
CSP used to contain a require-sri-for directive, but it was removed due to concerns around SRI not covering all script types, namely dynamic imports and workers.
As we solved dynamic imports, that may be enough to revive that proposal. The upcoming PCIv4 requirements definitely mean there's a use case for it.
We still don't have a way to apply SRI to workers, but maybe we can just not apply the policy to them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Related to #16
CSP used to contain a require-sri-for directive, but it was removed due to concerns around SRI not covering all script types, namely dynamic imports and workers.
As we solved dynamic imports, that may be enough to revive that proposal. The upcoming PCIv4 requirements definitely mean there's a use case for it.
We still don't have a way to apply SRI to workers, but maybe we can just not apply the policy to them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: