use automatic publishing

[samuelweiler]

Can we arrange for this doc to be automatically published, so we don't need to point at the editor's drafts?

If we need help, PLH is likely willing to help.

[torgo]

Looping in @ylafon…

[samuelweiler]

At the least, can we do another versioned release in the next week or so?

[hober]

Sounds good to me. I've never done this before, so I don't know where to start.

[ylafon]

There are manual steps when publishing as the (c) section is not the usual one, so it would require some adaptation in order to do automatic publishing.

[samuelweiler]

(c) section?

[samuelweiler]

Any update on this? I dislike that the published version is so very much out of date...

[ylafon]

There are roadblocks that we are working on, expect this to use automatic publishing once the issues in getting design-principles document to do the same will be solved.

[pes10k]

Publishing a snapshot sounds good to me!

[torgo]

Hi @ylafon any update on this? I think we are all keen to set up a process via which this can be auto-published.

[torgo]

Just to be clear - auto-publication would imply that joint agreement is reached between PING and TAG via the PR and PR approval mechanism. And therefore any merged PR is a-ok to auto-publish to TR space.

[wseltzer]

I understand there's a Process issue. In the meantime, could we mint a new snapshot?

[hober]

@wseltzer wrote, in February:

I understand there's a Process issue. In the meantime, could we mint a new snapshot?

A new snapshot got published in March.

Leaving this open as we still don't have automatic publishing set up for this document.

[samuelweiler]

Tickling this issue, since people file new issues (like #129) that are already fixed in the editor's draft.

[ylafon]

It should be part of implementation of process 2021 in specberus, so no progress can be made until the tool allow it.

[hober]

It should be part of implementation of process 2021 in specberus, so no progress can be made until the tool allow it.

I think those updates have happened, but I'm not sure. What say you, @ylafon?

[hober]

Any updates here, @ylafon @samuelweiler? We'd love to not have to think too hard about when to publish this thing.

[ylafon]

It is making (slow) progress, I should be able to test soon, if it works, then we can make it automatic.