[Bug]: 人机验证会成为刷评论的原因 || [Bug]: Human-machine verification will become the reason for brushing comments

[FrederickBun]

问题描述 | Describe the bug

本人在捣鼓自己评论的时候，发现了这样的现象：

因为Waline按 Command/Control + Enter 会发送，而又人机验证的时候就会按几次有几个人机验证，而此时输入框还有内容，所以每一次人机验证完成都会带内容发送，一次完成这些人机验证之后将会发送很多消息从而达到刷屏

Screen.Recording.2024-08-22.at.10.35.17.PM.mov

后台就会出现这样的惨状

建议修复为人机验证完成前不允许发送过多消息

如果没有人机验证，那么也有可能因为卡顿而导致刷屏（差不多意思，只是说那个刷的少些）

Note

本人仅在自己的Waline上实验，未对其他用户造成攻击

Warning

在BUG修复前，请熊孩子不要捣乱

问题网站 | Website URL

https://comment.setbun.com/

服务部署在哪里？ | Where your waline deploy?

Deta

数据存储在哪里？| Where your comment data store?

Deta Base

---

Problem description | Describe the bug

When I was tinkering with my comments, I discovered this phenomenon:

Because Waline presses Command/Control + Enter to send, and during human-computer verification, it will press several times for several human-computer verifications. At this time, the input box still has content, so every time the human-computer verification is completed, the content will be sent. After completing these human-machine verifications at once, many messages will be sent to achieve a refreshed screen.

Screen.Recording.2024-08-22.at.10.35.17.PM.mov

There will be such a tragic situation in the background

It is recommended to fix the problem of not allowing too many messages to be sent before human-machine verification is completed.

If there is no human-machine verification, it is possible that the screen will be refreshed due to lag (similar to the same meaning, it just means that the refresh rate is less)

Note

I only experimented on my own Waline and did not cause any attacks on other users.

Warning

Please don’t cause trouble until the bug is fixed.

Question Website | Website URL

https://comment.setbun.com/

Where is the service deployed? | Where your waline deploy?

Deta

Where is the data stored? | Where your comment data store?

Deta Base

[lizheming]

尝试了下，应该属于评论发送过程中的防止重复发送的问题，后续优化下这块。

---

After trying it, it seems that it is a problem of preventing repeated sending in the process of sending comments. I will optimize this in the future.

[jeremy0519]

用IPQPS是不是就可以了？

---

Is it enough to use IPQPS?