-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Wasmer's WAMR backend #17
Comments
I think we used |
Hello! By default, we build WAMR with |
@syrusakbary @xdoardo okay thanks a lot for the information! Probably makes sense to integrate WAMR support via Wasmer 5.0. :) Looking forward to the results once integration is complete. |
Copying here an answer from Wasmer Discord about building Wasmer 5.0 with multiple backends:
Building Wasmer 5.0 with WAMR:
|
@syrusakbary @xdoardo since some time has passed ... is it now possible to use the 3 different backends (cranelift, singlepass and WAMR) with the same Wasmer dependency to be able to include WAMR benchmarks into this project via Wasmer? |
Hello! It will be part of the 5.1 release. We don't have a clear schedule yet, but it'll probably come soon (i.e. next month). You can take a peek here: https://github.com/wasmerio/wasmer/tree/wasmer-5.1.0 |
@syrusakbary First, congrats to the Wasmer 5.0 update!
I have noticed that Wasmer 5.0 included WAMR as backend and wondered if it would make sense to add it as another Wasmer backend to
wasmi-benchmarks
? I have not yet included WAMR since it has no easy bindings for Rust but with Wasmer 5.0 this has probably changed.Does Wasmer 5.0 use WAMR's
fast-interpreter
,classic-interpreter
or one of its JITs? I'd be most interesting in itsfast-interpreter
backend from the Wasmi perspective.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: