-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Plugin should have access to its executionId #169
Comments
I agree that it would be beneficial to have the id stored on the server side and made accessible to the initiating user so other client access would have the potential to communicate with it. |
I had imagined that the plugin could determine where to store the executionId. In my use-case, the execution is associated with part of the model so I have been imagining that the plugin would store the executionId with the associated part of the model. |
Does the use case make sense? Basically, I would like to associate the execution with a part of the model by storing the execution ID in a node attribute. |
@kecso Would you be open to a PR changing this? Or do you have a better recommendation for how to associate a running plugin to a part of the model? This is currently causing some annoying forking and related issues... |
Currently, the
client
has access to a plugin's execution ID but this is not available to the plugin itself. This would be really nice so the executionId could be recorded by the plugin (and enable it to be canceled from a different browser session).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: