You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should consider the possibility that users of RDFShape can login to the application so they can store shapes, RDF data, SPARQL queries and so on. In this way, the UI experience would increase.
One drawback is that the complexity of RDFShape would increase as it would require a dependency on a database. However, the benefits can be great and we could track better the differente usages of the application.
Another possibility is that users can algo delegate their credentials to RDFShape allowing them to author shapes/entity schemas inside RDFShape and store them in Wikibases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should consider the possibility that users of RDFShape can login to the application so they can store shapes, RDF data, SPARQL queries and so on. In this way, the UI experience would increase.
One drawback is that the complexity of RDFShape would increase as it would require a dependency on a database. However, the benefits can be great and we could track better the differente usages of the application.
Another possibility is that users can algo delegate their credentials to RDFShape allowing them to author shapes/entity schemas inside RDFShape and store them in Wikibases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: