Checkbox readme doc needs elements image

[abumami]

OK, so I know the checkbox is super simple, and doesn't really have elements (that's the plural). But, it does have an element (that's the singular), and therefore should have an elements image (if you want to nitpick, you can call it an "element image") to be consistent with the other component readme docs.

[arnonkehat]

Didn't it have one previously?

[urik9]

I'm not sure about stylable-components but core3-components checkbox has an element image that we can use:
https://github.com/wixplosives/core3-components/blob/master/specs/checkbox.md

[abumami]

I suspect it had an image, but I would have to check archeological ruins to be sure. The core image that @urik9 is referring to is a behavior image and not strictly an elements image.

Seems to me that an older image (if it exists) would be OK, but I can't assume so. I just want to be sure that the image reflects the newest spec.

[abumami]

Just did some archeological spelunking (backups, drafts, older versions, etc) and could not find an elements image for checkbox.

[arnonkehat]

@urik9 your call. are you happy with what was in c3c? i think it could use standardization with the same app @maksymc is using for these drawings. though i have no clue what that is :)

[abumami]

@arnonkehat Good point re: standardizing app for the drawings. I mentioned early on that it drives me crazy that the drawings all have a different look. It seems like everyone is using a different drawing app. Would be nice if we could agree on one that satisfies everyone.

[arnonkehat]

@maksymc @urik9 @LeonidLevi can we agree on such a tool?