Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Reverse Query in Relationship field #108

Open
RodrigoTomeES opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Feature request: Reverse Query in Relationship field #108

RodrigoTomeES opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
type: enhancement Improvements to existing functionality

Comments

@RodrigoTomeES
Copy link

Hi,

Could you can implement reverse query in relationship field? I have not seen that it is implemented, if it is implemented, how can it be used?

Here you have an example in PHP https://www.advancedcustomfields.com/resources/querying-relationship-fields/

Thanks!

@jasonbahl jasonbahl added the type: enhancement Improvements to existing functionality label Mar 30, 2021
@dillonlara115
Copy link

I'd love to see this added in as well. might be able to help build as I have time but not sure where to start!

@jonsherrard
Copy link

Gah - Yeah this would be great! Just working on something now that could do with it 👍

@aureliocampos
Copy link

Adicionem consulta reversa no campo de relacionamento.
Por favor!

@jasonbahl
Copy link
Contributor

We're re-building this plugin over here: https://github.com/wp-graphql/wpgraphql-acf and now that ACF formally supports bi-directional relationships this is something we can more seriously consider supporting.

I'm going to transfer this issue over to the new repo for further discussion and consideration.

@jasonbahl jasonbahl transferred this issue from wp-graphql/wp-graphql-acf Nov 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement Improvements to existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants