Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

low GPU utilization rate #60

Open
zoraup opened this issue Oct 20, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

low GPU utilization rate #60

zoraup opened this issue Oct 20, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@zoraup
Copy link

zoraup commented Oct 20, 2020

Hello~
It's a very nice work!
I wonder why the GPU utilization is always low when I run the code, therefore the speed is slowed down, is there a way to solve the problem? thanks a lot~

@Veagau
Copy link

Veagau commented Dec 24, 2020

The same problem. When I run the cross-domain experiments on baseline with Conv4-net, I change the batch_size from 16 to 128, while the GPU utilization rate is still very low. To finish 1 epoch, more than 10 minutes needed on a RTX 2080Ti GPU. I wonder how long it takes to run the entire experiment in the original environment. @wyharveychen

@Veagau
Copy link

Veagau commented Dec 24, 2020

The same problem. When I run the cross-domain experiments on baseline with Conv4-net, I change the batch_size from 16 to 128, while the GPU utilization rate is still very low. To finish 1 epoch, more than 10 minutes needed on a RTX 2080Ti GPU. I wonder how long it takes to run the entire experiment in the original environment. @wyharveychen

I found that in the begining of training, the speed is very slow, while speeding up in the later training procedure.

Epoch 0 | Batch 468/469 | Loss 3.944826: 100%|████████████████████| 469/469 [12:53<00:00,  1.65s/it]
Epoch 1 | Batch 468/469 | Loss 3.422845: 100%|████████████████████| 469/469 [04:53<00:00,  1.60it/s]
Epoch 2 | Batch 468/469 | Loss 3.214282: 100%|████████████████████| 469/469 [01:00<00:00,  7.78it/s]
Epoch 3 | Batch 468/469 | Loss 3.078954: 100%|████████████████████| 469/469 [00:48<00:00,  9.57it/s]

@atseng17
Copy link

"speeding up in the later training procedure." Is there a reason why this happened?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants