-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EL9 does not support RPM SHA1 signatures anymore #51
Comments
@Obihoernchen What did you use to attempt to install xCAT ?
|
@gurevichmark I'm using
Does not work without GPG check either
|
|
Yes very same issue on RedHat 9 with latest upgrades.
Your new packages works fine:
|
@Obihoernchen One thing I can see, is the difference between
|
Just the xcat key from xcat-dep (automatically imported by dnf):
Looks like this is causing the difference:
For reference with installed xCAT GPG Key:
|
@Obihoernchen |
Just the xcat-dep repo file:
Then |
Fixed by xcat2/xcat-core#7262 xcat-dep RPMs signed with SHA256 are now at https://www.xcat.org/files/xcat/repos/yum/devel/xcat-dep/rh9/ |
Hi,
EL9 based OS's changed their crypto policies and dropped support for SHA1 keys. Therefore, packages from xcat-dep can't be installed without allowing legacy SHA1 keys. Disabling GPG checks does not help in this case.
See: https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/rhel-security-sha-1-package-signatures-distrusted-rhel-9
Trying to install xcat on x86-64 EL9 shows the following issues:
Can you sign the RPMs with more up2date SHA-256 or SHA-512 instead?
In the future this issue will affect other distros, too.
Note: For testing purposes you may remove the key with:
rpmsign --delsign <rpm>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: