Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assistance Request with the Diffuse Approximation Model (SRDA) #25

Open
ImanKafian opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Assistance Request with the Diffuse Approximation Model (SRDA) #25

ImanKafian opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ImanKafian
Copy link

ImanKafian commented Jun 21, 2024

Hi,
I am trying to use the SRDA class to estimate the reflectance value using the diffuse approximation method. To this end, I have two questions:

  1. Could you please introduce any literature support for the PyXopto-specific implementation of the diffuse approximation? An implementation of the diffuse approximation which is frequently seen in the literature is just the "_Rf" method of the SRDA class (shown below). I would like to know how the other terms are contributing to the estimated values of the reflectance in SRDA.

image

  1. Could you please explain how we can use the SRDA class to estimate the reflectance for a given set of (mua, musp, r, nmed, noutside)-values? My intention is to use it for estimating the reflectance in a fiberoptic configuration with an acceptance angle of 60 degrees and a separator distance of 2 mm . As shown below, I am getting a value of 11.755 which is exceeding the maximum possible value for reflectance (=1).

image
image

I couldn't understand what is the unit of the "r" argument in the call dunder method and assumed it should be in "m".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant