Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Looking for additional maintainers/contributors #122

Open
yahehe opened this issue Aug 8, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Looking for additional maintainers/contributors #122

yahehe opened this issue Aug 8, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@yahehe
Copy link
Owner

yahehe commented Aug 8, 2017

Hey everyone,

If any of you are interested in becoming a maintainer or regular contributor, feel free to give a shoutout (or comment below). Right now this project isn't in very active development so I don't anticipate much interest, but we might foray into supporting the OpenAPI 3 spec, which would probably require more hands on deck!

@yahehe yahehe modified the milestones: 2.0, OpenAPI 3 Aug 8, 2017
@yahehe yahehe self-assigned this Aug 8, 2017
@aregaz
Copy link

aregaz commented Apr 8, 2019

Hey @yahehe ! Thanks for the project!
I'm investigating an option to using Nancy.Swagger in our project, but it seems that not much happening here.
I'm wondering is it still worth sticking with Nancy Fx in the actively developing commercial project? Is Nancy Fx dead? Would appreciate your thoughts on this. Thanks!

@yahehe
Copy link
Owner Author

yahehe commented Apr 8, 2019

You owe someone else your thanks, I'm just helping maintain someone else's code.
My old team (@jnallard) still uses Nancy to my knowledge, they probably understand the current ecosystem better.

@jnallard
Copy link
Collaborator

jnallard commented Apr 8, 2019

We did a lot of work for supporting support DotNetCore Nancy, but the fact that it's not left prerelease in a couple years is worrying.
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Nancy/2.0.0-clinteastwood

My team still uses it and I like it, but we're not actively spinning up new services for it.
If we were, I'd probably be putting more work into this project.

@aregaz
Copy link

aregaz commented Apr 8, 2019

Thanks, guys!
We currently use Nancy too, and I really like it. But the absence of the 2.0 release in more than 2 years worries me too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants