Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Choose the right wordlist according to technologies found #954

Open
danzee1 opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Choose the right wordlist according to technologies found #954

danzee1 opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@danzee1
Copy link

danzee1 commented Sep 21, 2023

Hi,

As we know about SecLists. It should be downloaded along with the tool. Instead of letting blindly dirsearch. Dirsearch or other tool like ffuf should choose the relevant technology DIR search file from SecLists to do the directory research on a domain/subdomain.

For example, For a Wordpress subdomain, Rengine will direct the ffuf to choose the wordpress fuzz file from SecLists to do the dir searching.

Also, there is this Javascript recon strategy. Will be great to be implemented in the tool:
https://gist.github.com/m4ll0k/31ce0505270e0a022410a50c8b6311ff

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hi @danzee1,
Issues is only for reporting a bug/feature request. Please read documentation before raising an issue https://rengine.wiki
For very limited support, questions, and discussions, please join reNgine Discord channel: https://discord.gg/azv6fzhNCE
Please include all the requested and relevant information when opening a bug report. Improper reports will be closed without any response.

@psyray
Copy link
Contributor

psyray commented Sep 23, 2023

Hi,
Good idea for wordlists part, hard to implement, feel free to work on it.
And your link does not work

@psyray psyray added enhancement New feature or request 2.0.0 labels Nov 18, 2023
@psyray psyray changed the title Make the Rengine Intelligent Choose the right wordlist according to technologies found Nov 18, 2023
@yogeshojha yogeshojha removed the 2.0.0 label Nov 20, 2023
@AnonymousWP AnonymousWP removed the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants