Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strange behavior when touching a node on the screen #943

Open
afgb1977 opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Strange behavior when touching a node on the screen #943

afgb1977 opened this issue Feb 7, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@afgb1977
Copy link

afgb1977 commented Feb 7, 2025

Hi, I just noticed that OsmApp is bringing wrong information when touching a node on the screen. Example= when touching node123 it brings the info of way123.
Real example=
https://osmapp.org/#17/5.3302/-75.2873
Click on the name "Caldas" and you will see what I am trying to indicate.
This node corresponds to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/306394562
But osmapp brings to screen the information of:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306394562

The problem is not focused on this region, I have done the test in other countries and when touching any node osmapp brings to the screen the information corresponding to a way with the same numbering from the original node.

@afgb1977
Copy link
Author

afgb1977 commented Feb 7, 2025

The problem is even stranger since it only occurs when OpenFreeMap is enabled, it does not occur with MapTiler or any of the other maps.
Why can a particular layer (OpenFreeMap) generate a query error?

Image

@zbycz
Copy link
Owner

zbycz commented Feb 8, 2025

Thanks for the report. Yes, OpenFreeMap unfortunately encodes the ids wrong.

I should add a warning when using OFR here. I thought it would be resolved quickly as it is small change, but for some reason it had to be probably thought about more 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants