[ZIP 209] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary #950

daira · 2024-11-06T23:31:44Z

Also pay attention to the effects of fees and coinbase transactions.

See #957 for a similar issue relating to ZSAs.

daira added the ZIP clarification label Nov 6, 2024

daira self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024

daira added this to the Documentation Q4 2024 milestone Nov 6, 2024

daira changed the title ~~[ZIP 209] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary~~ [ZIPs 209 and 227] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary Nov 12, 2024

daira changed the title ~~[ZIPs 209 and 227] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary~~ [ZIPs 209, 226, and 227] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary Nov 12, 2024

daira mentioned this issue Nov 12, 2024

[ZIPs 226 and 227] The relative ordering of accesses to issuedAssets(AssetBase).balance for issuance and burning is undefined #957

Open

daira changed the title ~~[ZIPs 209, 226, and 227] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary~~ [ZIP 209] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary Nov 12, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[ZIP 209] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary #950

[ZIP 209] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary #950

daira commented Nov 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading

[ZIP 209] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary #950

[ZIP 209] Clarify that chain value pool balances must not go negative at any transaction boundary #950

Comments

daira commented Nov 6, 2024 • edited Loading

daira commented Nov 6, 2024 •

edited

Loading