Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Analyze the quality of test names and structure #165

Open
zmievsa opened this issue Mar 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Analyze the quality of test names and structure #165

zmievsa opened this issue Mar 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@zmievsa
Copy link
Owner

zmievsa commented Mar 17, 2024

Currently, Cadwyn uses the following test naming convention:

test__{WHAT_WE_TEST}__{IN_WHAT_CONTEXT}__should_{THE_EXPECTED_RESULT}. Note that we do not follow this style in test_routing and note that we do not write the expected result if it is obvious.

We need an expert to validate where Cadwyn could utilize this style more effectively in its tests. So we need a review of a few testing modules with a few concrete recommendations at the end of the review.

@tikon93 is the author of the style of naming above so he is the perfect candidate.

@zmievsa zmievsa added the tests label Mar 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant