Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem in second stage. #16

Open
XquDev opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Problem in second stage. #16

XquDev opened this issue Oct 30, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@XquDev
Copy link

XquDev commented Oct 30, 2019

For some reason, your code in the 2nd stage doesn't fold the communities correctly. I've tested with the data from the "Louvain" paper (Figure 1), by the end of the first iteration of first stage, I got six separated communities, which were {1,2,4}, {0,3,5,7}, {6}, {8,15},{9,12,14}, {10,11,13}. However, for certain vertex, let's say "7" from the group of {0,3,5,7} was computed "deltaQ" with vertex "3" instead of {6} in the second stage.

But the final result was correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant