feat: Fix 500 Error After Setting Authorized IP #7334
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ func WhiteAllow() gin.HandlerFunc { | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
| code := LoadErrCode() | |||
| helper.ErrWithHtml(c, code, "ip_limit") | |||
| helper.ErrWithHtml(c, code, "err_ip_limit") | |||
| } | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code change replaces "ip_limit" with "err_ip_limit" in an error handling function named WhiteAllow. The change does not introduce any obvious irregularities or significant performance issues, unless there was a specific context that requires such wording changes. It simply updates one of the strings used to identify or describe errors within the application.
If this is part of a larger project where consistency and possibly internationalization (i18n) considerations are at play, ensuring that all error messages align across resources might be advisable. However, for now, it seems the update addresses internal naming conventions rather than impacting functionality directly.
Recommendations: While the change itself doesn't require immediate attention, maintaining consistent error message names can improve readability and maintainability, especially if i18n practices are followed in future modifications.
| @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ const get = async () => { | |||
| } | |||
| paramModel.value.memoryLimit = res.data.memoryLimit; | |||
| paramModel.value.cpuQuota = res.data.cpuQuota; | |||
| paramModel.value.memoryUnit = res.data.memoryUnit !== '' ? res.data.memoryUnit : 'MB'; | |||
| paramModel.value.memoryUnit = res.data.memoryUnit !== '' ? res.data.memoryUnit : 'M'; | |||
| paramModel.value.allowPort = res.data.allowPort; | |||
| paramModel.value.containerName = res.data.containerName; | |||
| paramModel.value.advanced = false; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The changes between lines 259 in both versions of the code indicate an inconsistency in handling memory units. The original code assigns "M" to paramModel.value.memoryUnit if res.data.memoryUnit is an empty string. However, the version with the comment has a typo, assigning 'MB' rather than 'M'. It would be advisable to correct this discrepancy to ensure consistent behavior with whatever logic expects regarding memory unit formatting. Here's how you can adjust it:
Original Code snippet (line 259):
- paramModel.value.memoryUnit = res.data.memoryUnit !== '' ? res.data.memoryUnit : 'MB';
+ paramModel.value.memoryUnit = ... // Ensure consistent unit format
Corrected Version:
paramModel.value.memoryUnit = res.data.memoryUnit !== '' ? res.data.memoryUnit : 'M';
// Optionally, consider adding a function that formats memory units based on your requirements
paramModel.value.memoryUnit = validateMemoryUnit(res.data.memoryUnit);
```
Remember to implement a corresponding validation function (`validateMemoryUnit`) if necessary to handle more complex scenarios where different input values might denote the same measurement unit.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.