Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: Increase the height of the script input box #7396

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

ssongliu
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

case 'cutWebsiteLog':
case 'clean':
case 'snapshot':
case 'ntp':
return i18n.global.t('cronjob.' + label);
case 'container_images':
return i18n.global.t('clean.images');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet contains several improvements and corrections:

  1. Consistency in Handling Labels: The function checks for common labels like "curl", "shell", etc., which is good practice to handle various types of content consistently.

  2. Optimization: By grouping similar cases together, the function simplifies readability and reduces redundancy:

    case 'curl':
    case 'shell':
        return i18n.global.t('cronjob.' + label);
  3. Corrected Case Sensitivity:

    • Removed incorrect conditions case 'app', case 'website', case 'database', case 'directory', case 'log' since they don't match with the keys being compared ( cronjob.).
  4. Removed Duplicates: Ensured that each condition is only checked once (e.g., no duplicate case entries).

Overall, these changes help make the code cleaner and more maintainable while preserving its functionality.

@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
:indent-with-tab="true"
:tabSize="4"
:lineWrapping="true"
style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px"
style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px; height: 100px"
theme="cobalt"
:styleActiveLine="true"
:matchBrackets="true"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes made to the code snippet aim to increase the height of the component's textarea from its current margin-top setting to a specified 100% height. Here are some points to consider:

Irregularity/Issue:

There is no actual change in the size of the textarea. Both versions have the same total height (height: 100px) and width (width: 100%). Therefore, this modification does not affect the appearance or functionality of the component.

Potential Issues:

  • Clarity: The change might be unclear to users because it doesn't significantly impact visual presentation but alters one property (height).

Optimization Suggestions:

Although the change isn't altering visual attributes that will affect user interactions, you could maintain clarity by including comments explaining why these properties were changed:

style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px; /** * Increase height for better view * */ height: 100%"

This comment would help other developers understand the specific intention behind increasing the height.

Copy link
Member

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@wanghe-fit2cloud
Copy link
Member

/approve

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 17, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot merged commit 35e7b11 into dev Dec 17, 2024
7 checks passed
@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot deleted the pr@dev@fix_cache_clean branch December 17, 2024 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants