-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
style: Increase the height of the script input box #7396
Conversation
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
case 'cutWebsiteLog': | ||
case 'clean': | ||
case 'snapshot': | ||
case 'ntp': | ||
return i18n.global.t('cronjob.' + label); | ||
case 'container_images': | ||
return i18n.global.t('clean.images'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code snippet contains several improvements and corrections:
-
Consistency in Handling Labels: The function checks for common labels like "curl", "shell", etc., which is good practice to handle various types of content consistently.
-
Optimization: By grouping similar cases together, the function simplifies readability and reduces redundancy:
case 'curl': case 'shell': return i18n.global.t('cronjob.' + label);
-
Corrected Case Sensitivity:
- Removed incorrect conditions
case 'app'
,case 'website'
,case 'database'
,case 'directory'
,case 'log'
since they don't match with the keys being compared (cronjob.
).
- Removed incorrect conditions
-
Removed Duplicates: Ensured that each condition is only checked once (e.g., no duplicate
case
entries).
Overall, these changes help make the code cleaner and more maintainable while preserving its functionality.
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ | |||
:indent-with-tab="true" | |||
:tabSize="4" | |||
:lineWrapping="true" | |||
style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px" | |||
style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px; height: 100px" | |||
theme="cobalt" | |||
:styleActiveLine="true" | |||
:matchBrackets="true" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes made to the code snippet aim to increase the height of the component's textarea from its current margin-top
setting to a specified 100%
height. Here are some points to consider:
Irregularity/Issue:
There is no actual change in the size of the textarea. Both versions have the same total height (height: 100px
) and width (width: 100%
). Therefore, this modification does not affect the appearance or functionality of the component.
Potential Issues:
- Clarity: The change might be unclear to users because it doesn't significantly impact visual presentation but alters one property (height).
Optimization Suggestions:
Although the change isn't altering visual attributes that will affect user interactions, you could maintain clarity by including comments explaining why these properties were changed:
style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px; /** * Increase height for better view * */ height: 100%"
This comment would help other developers understand the specific intention behind increasing the height.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.