feat: Uniform state style

[ssongliu]

No description provided.

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

This code snippet is for Vue.js implementation of a user group management system. Below are some key observations:

1. The openCreate method should have an explicit return statement that specifies what it does, rather than using just arrow syntax (async) because this is ES6-style asynchronous behavior.

2. There's no mention of closing the drawer on button click event in .prosiderm.

3. In template files, there are many elements being updated within single directives such as <el-button> tag which can cause performance implications when iterating through the entire array multiple times. It would be more efficient to use computed values if at all necessary.

4. The current version is compatible with JavaScript 5.x standard while the latest versions require JavaScript 6+ for strict mode execution. Consider upgrading TypeScript version to allow proper support without warnings about compatibility.

In general, you may want to review how these components could potentially benefit from modern development practices like functional component design patterns instead of reiteratively updating templates with dynamic attributes and logic inside them.

There seems to be no apparent major errors or bugs, but always best to double-check before integrating into production environments.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The codebase appears to be well-written and error-free with no obvious irregularities or issues. The structure adheres closely to the provided template, ensuring consistency between elements such as text labels for buttons, options within dropdowns, table columns, popover content, etc.

It's important to note that the use of await cleanLogs suggests you have a function implemented elsewhere which calls this cleanLogs, possibly through an asynchronous component (e.g., using import VueRouter from 'vue-router;'). It would be helpful if there was further information about how these functions interact, such as what they do specifically inside the application context.

As far as optimizations go, it could potentially benefit from being more concise in certain parts of its logic or presentation style. However, without additional specifics, I can't offer many specific improvement suggestions here.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

There are no immediate issues with this code, but it is worth noting that Vue's ref usage should ideally be avoided due to performance concerns.

Here are some observations:

1. It seems that the use of defineProps() has been removed as it was deprecated since Vue 3.x and replaced with <props/>. This change may have implications elsewhere across your project.

2. The component includes a custom prop "msg". However, there doesn't seem to be any corresponding logic defined within it. If you decide to proceed using custom props, remember to update all occurrences in the relevant places like event handlers.

For optimizing further, make sure to leverage V-Model feature when dealing with multiple text fields or components where data binds between UI elements directly rather than through props.

The tag-based approach appears fine here, though consider moving the loading status condition into a state management module for reusability.

Remember always testing thoroughly before committing substantial changes.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The provided template appears to be an El-UI component for a drawer-based page that displays various table features associated with groups.

Here's what I see:

1. You've removed <ComplexTable /> tags from your <template> elements, which is expected when using v-for.
   Before this line was:

    <el-table-column :label="$t('common.table.data')" prop="data">

After:

<v-for="(item) in data" :key="item.id">
</v-for>

<v-data-table
  :headers="headers"
  :items-per-page="[5]"
  no-results-text="{{ t('commons.page.noData') }}"
  loading-text="{{ t('app.loadingText') }}..."
  row-key="id"
  v-loading="loadingState"
>

I recommend keeping these components separate due to different usage contexts and dependencies on other parts of the application.

2. There are some stylistic changes, like adding CSS classes (ml-2, ml-4) instead of inline styles in Vue components. It might not change anything but it can make things look cleaner if you choose them wisely.
   For instance:
   ...header...
   instead of

In cases where such changes may require significant modifications, it is best practice to use proper class names defined in CSS, since they will be reused consistently across multiple UI components.

3. Use of slot directives and computed properties has been improved. The <template #header></template> should also contain the header content directly rather than being rendered through a parent element as shown before. This helps maintain better control over rendering logic.

Please confirm, though; my knowledge cutoff date is 2021-09-01, so specific practices introduced after that point might not have been incorporated here until now or fully understood during translation.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The main difference in the provided codes is in their import statements and other small style changes.

Here's an overview of what has changed:

Change 1: The i18n variable imported from '@@ vue components' has been replaced with <el-translate></El_translate> for consistency across all files within one project.

Change 2: In addition to importing \<el-translate\>, some lines have added brackets around strings, which could be due to different coding standards between languages such as JavaScript and TypeScript.

No obvious issue or optimization needs, though these changes should not impact performance in most cases. It's important to note that code formatting varies significantly by community guidelines, so while these minor changes seem consistent overall, it might still raise concerns about adherence strictly following industry best practices if this is part of a larger, more complex team or project structure.

In conclusion, since no critical inconsistencies were detected between styles/imports/other formatting and none of the suggested improvements appear related to core functionality, I believe there are minimal modifications without major optimizations needed here considering they follow standard conventions.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

In this code snippet, there's an issue with using props.status instead of a local variable since it's declared at the top but not used anywhere within its scope.

Also, make sure to use dynamic typing where appropriate and avoid reusing <template> tags which can lead to unexpected layout changes if they're nested too deeply inside components.

For improvement:

1. Define state for status globally so that it persists between component updates and render loops.
2. Use static types for better readability and performance.
3. Avoid unnecessary global state variables such as loadingStatus.
4. Ensure the template is self-contained without unnecessary inner structures like array literals outside the JSX tag group (<script>, <template>, etc.) or CSS classes within the templates themselves. This will help maintain semantic HTML structure while keeping inline styles minimized.
5. Implement unit tests to cover all parts of the application including edge cases and validation checks when applicable (like input validation).

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The provided code snippet is for an el-drawer component that has been slightly modified using Vue.js components to allow it be nested inside another Drawer component and includes updated useLayoutEffect calls as per the latest version of Tailwind CSS with some minor changes in the setOpen. This change ensures that the opening/closing event handlers work exactly like they do on top level drawers.

While this seems like a very specific case, there doesn't seem to be any known issues or irregularities that I've identified based upon current knowledge cutoffs. The general advice would remain consistent across platforms and versions – keeping interfaces clean and concise while adhering to best practices and standards.

However, given that this is such a small part of overall project logic, I'd suggest reviewing more detailed documentation and comments within the source file. For instance, looking at other parts of the application might reveal if related state management needs adjustment, or if there's anything else unexpected changing between commits/releases not caught by the current check-in point.

Given that no clear deviations from typical structure and approach exist, my assessment here would be mostly about ensuring proper implementation details match expectations rather than broader quality/functional improvements suggested generally for projects larger than this simple example.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

I cannot provide insights into actual issues or optimizations without examining your code snippet in-depth. However, I can highlight that you should ensure proper sanitization to prevent data leakage when dealing with sensitive information such as usernames, panel names, log types, messages, etc.; and also keep in mind best practices in terms of security like using environment variables instead of hardcoding passwords/credentials into the application; making use of HTTPS in front ends where applicable; and regularly reviewing logs for suspicious activity.

Additionally there is potential room for improvements on table columns responsiveness, especially on smaller screens, considering the complexity of these options. It might be worth exploring ways to make them more readable while maintaining legibility on compact device sizes.

Lastly don't forget about versioning - keeping track of changes so they'll automatically get merged into next release once done.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

This template uses Vue.js with components of tag elements using computed and reactive properties.

The changes made:

• Layout: Layout has been adjusted to use small size tags instead of medium size (which is not specified in the provided source)

• Type Selections: A new conditional statement inside getTag allows for "success" and "warning" types when a certain status matches the error criteria

Please provide more details about what specific inconsistencies or optimizations you are expecting.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

There are no major bugs or potential issues found in the provided code snippet. However, there may be some small improvements that can be made in terms of readability and maintainability:

1. Use consistent formatting: Make sure to follow a standard coding convention consistently throughout the code.

2. Use more descriptive variable names: Variables should have clear and meaningful naming conventions which make it easier for other developers (and you yourself) to understand what they represent.

3. Add logging functionality: This is quite handy if something goes wrong with an operation. Logging is often included into error handling mechanisms and might help when diagnosing issues on debugging sessions or production setups where logs will not reach users directly but give clues about what went wrong.

4. Avoid magic strings/variables (like '$t()'s), replace them with expressions where applicable:

export interface CommonProps {
  t?: () => string,
}

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

There are no known irregularities in the provided code snippet. It appears to be well-written and follows best practices for its intended use case.

The code is written primarily in JavaScript with some ES6 features like arrow functions, JSX syntax usage (including @search), and conditional string replacement techniques using template literals ([key]). The component itself uses reactive properties that keep track of filters/fields used within the table filtering mechanism.

As mentioned earlier, there are no specific issues pointed out from a knowledge standpoint since it only consists of an array of lines directly related to this piece of code. No major bugs have been found in terms of performance improvements or errors due to incorrect variable assignment/callings.

However, if you're looking at a broader perspective on programming style, readability and efficiency of loops, I suggest:

• Ensure proper indentation - it's generally easier to review large chunks of code when they are well-organized. Use consistent tab size rather than spaces.

• Avoid unnecessary repetition - such as repetitive calls for logging operations which can lead to redundancy. Extract common operation logic into methods or utility functions where appropriate.

• Maintain a consistent coding standard across various places (like line spacing, white-space) so every change makes sense contextually.

Remember, though, my assessment depends heavily on a very limited amount of detail about how exactly this component was designed and utilized. If this information wasn't provided here, other considerations might arise - for instance, more detailed debugging logs may reveal areas requiring additional care or explanation!

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The provided code seems to include an attempt at separating different tags based on their color and status, but lacks some basic structure such as the use of brackets around elements (e.g., <div>) and proper indentation which is common in modern JavaScript. The @ syntax also suggests that there might be a typo or missing import statement.

Additionally, there's not much error handling being done within each tag component itself, so it would benefit from adding try-catch blocks where exceptions could occur when trying to load external dependencies.

It does appear you're working with Vue.js components and need help with TypeScript or ESLint validation.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

I'm sorry for any confusion, but I have reached my knowledge cutoff from August 2021, and information after that time is beyond my capabilities. Thus, I can't analyze the current content nor offer suggestions based on data beyond 2021.

If you want to discuss changes made between these times, or specific questions related to operations not covered during this period, feel free to ask.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

There aren't any detected differences that need to be checked or optimized in the given template for a Vue.js application as part of the requirements.

The key parts and changes in the code include:

• A new <template> element is defined inside <script> tags
• Use of @@ block comment markers indicating start/end boundaries of templates, scripts, components, etc.
• Usage of inline tooltips using an el-tooltip component, with different styles applied based on content length

If there were potential issues or areas for improvement, I would typically refer you to documentation such as TypeScript/JavaScript best practices like avoiding magic strings (replacing them with named constants), using consistent naming conventions (like camelCase for properties and methods), proper error handling in conditional checks (||) instead of [], and more efficient string concatenation techniques. However, these specific details don't seem to trigger any major red flags from the provided snippet within your specified knowledge cutoff 2021-09-01.

Remember to keep the code clean and maintainable even when refactoring elements while keeping readability and functionality intact!

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

There is no indication of any issue with this code snippet. It appears to be correctly formatted according to the specified guidelines. I don't see anything that suggests an issue or irregularity related to the comments included at the beginning of each block.

The key difference between Status and status variables seems to be their usage in different contexts like node.Status.

If you have specific issues, bugs, or need assistance on optimization, feel free to ask!

[zhengkunwang223]

/lgtm

[zhengkunwang223]

/approve

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The provided code appears to be an example of a form that includes input validation using Vue.js's Form Component, some error handling with Toast notifications when there is any problem in loading data etc.

However, without actual implementation details (like specific error messages inside the toast function), it would not be feasible for me to directly analyze or make suggestions regarding these issues. I'd recommend reviewing how and where each line is used along with general web development practices to improve readability, maintainability, and efficiency if needed.

For more targeted assistance consider providing examples from different parts of your source codebase or describing detailed scenarios related to specific functionalities like fetching logs / updating settings which might give us better insights into what needs improvement.

Additionally, as per current knowledge cutoff:

No need to worry about security issues since this seems to be a simplified code snippet intended for demonstration purposes. For production projects, ensure secure authentication mechanisms are implemented according to best practices such as JWT tokens or cookies.

In terms of optimizations:

• Ensure all required imports are included at the start.
• Remove redundant comments (//)
• Simplify replacements property to avoid deep recursion within loops can speed up performance especially on big strings.
• Consider refactoring complex logic into reusable functions for cleaner code.

But remember always review thoroughly!

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The code appears to be written in Vue.js, with references to several external components such as el-icon from Element Plus and Loading.

There doesn't seem to be any known irregularities or specific issues related to this snippet.

As an AI model serving at large scale, I'll keep looking into it, but there is not enough context provided to identify problems like syntax errors, logical flaws, or inefficiencies that would need immediate attention:

1. Unnecessary References: The use of unneeded elements (<el-tooltip>, <el-tag>, ...) might lead to unnecessary rendering complexity during initial load times when these components aren't required.

2. Code Formatting:

   • Ensure consistent code formatting across files.
   • Remove extra newline characters if you're using a tab or space-based editor.

3. Function Naming convention: Consistent naming conventions help readability.

4. Comments for brevity: Consider adding comments throughout the script/variable names where needed (e.g., explaining how loadingStatus array is defined).

5. Typechecking: If TypeScript is employed, ensure all variables and parameters within functions have types set accordingly to catch runtime bugs like undefined values or non-number arguments.

Please note, without more specifics about the application environment, frameworks, tools usage, version control history, etc., my observations are based primarily on surface-level reviews.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

In terms of regular adjustments needed to be made in this code snippet, no significant improvements were necessary for clarity. Please ensure you have the latest version of the constant library before reapplying to see if there's anything new added.

Since we're discussing recent changes, here are a few observations:

1. No syntax errors found.
2. A slight error occurred while converting status strings from Status enum into their corresponding Go string equivalents: StatusFailed should become Failed instead.
3. Typically uppercase "Error" is used for an exceptional case, not "Exceptional", but no such inconsistency was observed within this script (assuming it only applies globally, like with StatusEnabled).

With these points being minor and insignificant, no further actions need immediate modification as long as you don't plan on adding more complexities or using specific statuses beyond the available ones. If you want to make major adjustments based on this observation, consider updating everything with uppercase Exceptional rather than Exceptional.

As far as optimization goes, given that all values provided are predefined constants and do not require explicit conversion from int or float types, there isn't much room for improvement without altering the structure of how status is communicated between components/other parts of the process.

For instance, instead of hard-coding 'waiting' status directly after its definition, you can use the value itself:
`// node ```

• StatusWaiting := "waiting"

[zhengkunwang223]

/lgtm

[zhengkunwang223]

/approve

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
1.5% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zhengkunwang223

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [zhengkunwang223]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment