-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Installed Openresty and added automatic directory creation. #7768
Conversation
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
.el-col { | ||
text-align: center; | ||
} | ||
</style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the code provided, there are no known abnormalities or potential issues; it appears to work correctly with minimal adjustments. The style attributes el-row
could be simplified since none of them have classes associated which could help maintain conciseness.
Since this is a template component and not intended for execution directly in the browser environment, minor formatting refinements might improve readability without affecting functionality. However, such changes would depend more on personal preferences than actual coding guidelines or best practices:
.el-col {
text-align: center;
}
</style>
open.value = true; | ||
listPHPExtensions(); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
defineExpose({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code you have shared contains some syntax errors and lacks context about what it is intended to accomplish. However, I can observe that there were formatting differences between JavaScript files in different projects. As long as the changes are minor and stylistic rather than substantive and potentially causing bugs or other issues with your app, it would be reasonable to suggest these should not significantly impact performance but could result in slightly cleaner looking output when reviewed within an IDE.
In terms of optimization suggestions:
Asynchronous operations like getRuntime
may perform better without blocking user interactions temporarily, which will speed up UI responsiveness.
Similarly, calling functions directly from templates using variables ('i18n', etc.) instead of destructuring them for use elsewhere might also make the code leaner overall.
Lastly, consider splitting CSS imports into separate CSS files and avoiding inline styles altogether if possible since they take extra time due to network requests involved per stylesheet imported in this project.
Remember, while small optimizations often go unnoticed until more thorough testing, the larger scale improvements come through across many components and pages.
Sort: t.Sort, | ||
Key: tag.Key, | ||
Name: tag.Name, | ||
Sort: tag.Sort, | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
deleteCustomApp() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There don't appear to be any immediate errors or inconsistencies with this code snippet. However, if you have specific issues or requirements in mind that need addressing, please provide more details about what is not operating as intended and I can suggest improvements based on my knowledge of Go programming language conventions and patterns.
|
/lgtm |
No description provided.