Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Raise to QGIS 3.22 and PG 13 #168

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

Raise to QGIS 3.22 and PG 13 #168

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

Gustry
Copy link
Member

@Gustry Gustry commented Aug 26, 2024

Superseeds #161

@effjot @mdouchin I'm thinking to update straight to QGIS 3.28 minimum, anything against ?

It's just because we are providing a QGIS project in the plugin itself, and we want to have it with the minimum version allowed to avoid incompatibility issue.

@Gustry Gustry changed the title Raise to QGIS 3.22 and PG 14 Raise to QGIS 3.22 and PG 13 Aug 26, 2024
@Gustry Gustry force-pushed the qgis-3-22-and-pg branch 4 times, most recently from 012b3ed to 285d9bf Compare August 26, 2024 10:06
@Gustry Gustry force-pushed the qgis-3-22-and-pg branch 2 times, most recently from 5be7c8e to 4384a98 Compare August 26, 2024 12:02
@Gustry Gustry merged commit 067f3ed into master Aug 26, 2024
9 checks passed
@Gustry Gustry deleted the qgis-3-22-and-pg branch August 26, 2024 12:49
@effjot
Copy link
Contributor

effjot commented Aug 26, 2024

Qgis version 3.22 (branch name) or 3.28 (your message and PR title)?
Both are fine with me, but 3.28 might be a bit too new – the current LTR is 3.34.

@Gustry
Copy link
Member Author

Gustry commented Aug 26, 2024

The minimum is QGIS 3.22 now since this PR is merged.
I was going to propose a PR for 3.28.

@effjot
Copy link
Contributor

effjot commented Aug 26, 2024

ok, thanks for the clarification

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants